• Users Online: 314
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 38-42

Salivary versus serum testosterone levels in boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty


1 Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Specialized Medical Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
3 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt

Date of Submission14-Aug-2018
Date of Acceptance26-Aug-2018
Date of Web Publication24-Apr-2019

Correspondence Address:
Eman H El-Adawy
Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Specialized Medical Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ejim.ejim_66_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background Salivary testosterone (Sal-T) has been established as a noninvasive biomarker in the diagnosis of androgen deficiency in men. However, available data on its utility in adolescent boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) are not conclusive. Our study was designed to compare salivary versus serum measurements of free testosterone (FT) from the samples collected simultaneously and correlated them with the clinical parameters in boys with CDGP.
Patients and methods The study enrolled 25 adolescent boys with CDGP and 20 healthy controls matched for age and sex. Weight, height, BMI, testicular volume, bone age, serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH) were assessed. Simultaneous morning saliva and serum samples were obtained for FT measurements by radioimmunoassay and Sal-T by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique.
Results Adolescent boys with CDGP had significantly lower Sal-T and serum free-T than normal controls (P<0.001). Sal-T positively correlated with BMI, bone age, testicular volume, serum FSH, LH, and FT. With multiple regression analysis BMI, FSH, LH, and serum FT remained independently correlated with Sal-T. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve, Sal-T was found to be more sensitive than serum FT (76 vs. 69%) in the clinical assessment of boys with CDGP.
Conclusion Our data shows that Sal-T strongly correlates with FT and provides a sensitive, simple, noninvasive, and diagnostic approach for androgen status in adolescent boys with CDGP.

Keywords: constitutional delay of growth and puberty, free testosterone, salivary testosterone


How to cite this article:
El-Adawy EH, El-Khamisy ET, El-Said G, Seleem A. Salivary versus serum testosterone levels in boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty. Egypt J Intern Med 2019;31:38-42

How to cite this URL:
El-Adawy EH, El-Khamisy ET, El-Said G, Seleem A. Salivary versus serum testosterone levels in boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty. Egypt J Intern Med [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 18];31:38-42. Available from: http://www.esim.eg.net/text.asp?2019/31/1/38/256983




  Introduction Top


Constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) is a disorder occurring in healthy adolescents who have short stature compared with their peers, with delay in bone growth and puberty [1]. Most boys with CDGP begin to deviate from the normal growth curve before the age of 2 years, and subsequently grow at a relatively normal velocity, and then have a delayed pubertal growth spurt [2]. In boys with CDGP, a testicular volume of 3–4 ml is first reached when they are more than 13.7 years old. The sleep-related luteinizing hormone (LH) increase that characterizes the onset of puberty is normally present in CDGP. The LH response to LH-releasing hormone analogs is intermediate between that of hypogonadal patients and normal pubertal children [3]. CDGP represents the extreme tail of the normal distribution, aggregates in families [4], and is much more common in boys [5].

A suspected diagnosis of CDGP can be confirmed only when puberty and the pubertal growth spurt finally do occur spontaneously. In boys, puberty is characterized by increasing concentrations of gonadal testosterone driven by increasing concentrations of pituitary gonadotrophins which are, in turn, regulated by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone released by the hypothalamus [6],[7]. A functional defect in any of the components of this hormonal axis directly affects puberty and reproduction.

Circulating testosterone is routinely measured in laboratories for investigation of puberty-related disorders. Normally, testosterone circulates in the plasma either free (2.23%) or bound to serum proteins; sex hormone-binding globulin [8]. Bioavailable testosterone, including both the measurable free and albumin bound fractions, might reflect more accurately the clinical situation when the total serum testosterone is borderline or steroid-binding protein levels are impaired [9].

Saliva is a widely accepted sample source for steroid analysis and offers a noninvasive and stress-free alternative to plasma [10]. Salivary testosterone (Sal-T) reflects the free fraction of plasma testosterone that is able to diffuse passively across the salivary glands, independent of the salivary flow rate [11]. Recently Sal-T was suggested as a biomarker for the diagnosis of male androgen deficiency, representing an attractive alternative to plasma [12],[13],[14].

Unfortunately, the usefulness of Sal-T was not further investigated specially in boys with CDGP who are frequently referred for endocrine clinics for evaluation. So the aim of this study was to investigate if Sal-T could become a reliable noninvasive tool to screen or assess the androgen status in boys with CDGP.


  Patients and methods Top


The study enrolled 25 adolescent boys with CDGP, from 14 to 16 years of age. Twenty healthy adolescent boys were matched for age in the mid-pubertal and late-pubertal stage (3–5 Tanner stage) as controls. Informed consents were obtained from all participants, and approval was given by the ethics committee of our institution.

The diagnosis of CDGP was based on short stature (height <2 SD below the mean), delayed puberty (onset delayed by >2 SD; has not achieved 4 ml testes until aged 13 years), bone age below the 10th centile for chronological age (delayed by >1.5 years), and absence of other causes of delayed puberty as assessed by routine history taking, physical examination, and biochemical investigations.

BMI was calculated from measurement of the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters. Pubertal stage was evaluated based on the method of Tanner and Whitehouse [15]. Skeletal age was determined on left wrist radiographs using the Greulich and Pyle method. Bone age delay was noted as the difference between skeletal and chronological age.

Hormonal analysis

Determination of serum free testosterone (FT) was done by direct competitive radioimmunoassay analog tracer [16] and determination of serum LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) by an automated chemiluminescent immunometric assay [17],[18].

Determination of Sal-T: the participants were asked to avoid eating or drinking or brushing their teeth for 30 min before sampling and they were asked to rinse their mouth with cold water for 5 min before sampling. Three milliliters of saliva was collected by direct spitting into glass tubes. The samples were stored at 20°C till the time of the analysis. Sal-T was measured by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [19].

Statistical analysis

Data entry and analysis were performed using SPSS statistical package version 17. The results are expressed as the mean±SD. Comparisons of the mean differences between the two groups were performed using Student’s t test. The P value was considered significant if less than 0.05. Pearson’s correlation was used to correlate different quantitative variables. Simple regression analysis was performed with Sal-T as the dependent variable and all other parameters as independent variables. Multiple regression analysis was also performed with Sal-T as the dependent variable and BMI, testicular volume, bone age, FSH, LH, and testosterone as independent variables. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to demonstrate graphically the sensitivities and specificities of the different diagnostic tests and cutoff values optimized for sensitivities.


  Results Top


Baseline characteristics of the adolescents with CDGP and age-matched and sex-matched controls are given in [Table 1]. Adolescent boys with CDGP had significantly lower body weight, height, BMI, testicular volume, and bone age than controls. FSH, LH, FT, and Sal-T levels were significantly lower (P<0.001) in adolescent boys with CDGP than controls.
Table 1 Patient characteristics

Click here to view


Correlations between Sal-T levels and all other parameters

Sal-T levels were positively correlated with height, weight, testicular volume, bone age, FSH (P=0.04), LH (P=0.038), and FT (P=0.039) ([Table 2]).
Table 2 Correlation between salivary testosterone and clinical and biochemical parameters in the constitutional delay of growth and puberty group

Click here to view


A multiple regression analysis to assess the independent effect of the studied variables (BMI, testicular volume, bone age, FSH, LH, and FT) on Sal-T level was also performed. BMI (b=0.77, P=0.002), FSH (b=0.64, P=0.03), LH (b=0.66, P=0.02), and testosterone (b=0.41, P=0.009) remained independently correlated with Sal-T levels.

Using the ROC curve, Sal-T was found to be more sensitive than serum FT (76 vs. 52%) in diagnosing CDGP based on the clinical criteria, while the specificity of serum FT was 88 versus 69% for Sal-T ([Figure 1] and [Figure 2]).
Figure 1 Salivary testosterone. ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

Click here to view
Figure 2 Free testosterone. ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Concerns raised by the diagnostic use of saliva are many and variably appreciated. The present study was made to investigate the reliability of a noninvasive procedure for the measurement of testosterone in saliva as a diagnosing tool in cases of CDGP, and comparing its utility with serum FT.

Our results showed a significantly lower Sal-T levels in adolescent boys with CDGP in comparison with the control group (P<0.001). Moreover, Sal-T levels were positively correlated with FT (P=0.039). These results are in good agreement with those of other studies in normal boys conducted by Umehara et al. [20] indicate that Sal-T correlates well with FT in boys. Furthermore, this adds to the previous literature confirming that Sal-T correlates with FT as described in healthy men [21],[22],[23].

While Sal-T is considered a mirror of FT in normal adolescent boys or those with low T as in boys with CDGP and men with hypogonadism, it is of greater diagnostic use in hyperandrogenic conditions as hirsutism, where it was a reliable method than any of the currently used serum androgen assays [24],[25].

This study showed a statistically significant correlation between Sal-T and LH and FSH levels (r=0.42, P=0.038 and r=0.44, P=0.04), which is considered the main biochemical standard in the assessment of androgen status. Also a significant correlation was found between Sal-T and BMI, testicular volume, and bone age. These results are in agreement with the findings seen in normal men and those with hypogonadism [21],[26],[27],[28] and indicate the relationship between Sal-T and the clinical parameters of puberty as seen with serum testosterone [29].Despite the limitations of using saliva, like being affected by changes in salivary PH and flow, its use is increasing so much [30]. This goes with Chiappin et al. [31], who stated that it is likely that the use of saliva in assays will continue to expand, thus providing a new tool of investigation for physiologic as well as pathophysiologic conditions.

Finally, in our study, the reliability of Sal-T was documented using the ROC which showed that Sal-T was found to be more sensitive than serum FT (76 vs. 69%) in diagnosing boys with CDGP, while the specificity of serum FT was 88 versus 52% for Sal-T. The constellation of clinical parameters and the documentation of the sensitivity of measurement of Sal-T might indicate that determination of Sal-T is a reliable method to detect changes in the concentration of the biologically active testosterone in the serum.

The importance of this study is that Sal-T measurement if really diagnostic would be a noninvasive approach to screen androgen status in boys with CDGP and abolish the use of other markers using the venous sample.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Sedlmeyer IL, Palmert MR. Delayed puberty: analysis of a large case series from an academic center. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:1613–1620.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Villamor E, Jansen EC. Nutritional determinants of the timing of puberty. Annu Rev Public Health 2016; 37:33–46.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shirtcliff EA, Dahl RE, Pollak SD. Pubertal development: correspondence between hormonal and physical development. Child Dev 2009; 80:327–337.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Toublanc JE, Roger M, Chaussain JL. Etiologies of late puberty. Horm Res 1991; 36:136–140.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sedlmeyer IL, Hirschhorn JN, Palmert MR. Pedigree analysis of constitutional delay of growth and maturation: determination of familial aggregation and inheritance patterns. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:5581–5586.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Flier JS, Underhill LH. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone: role of pulsatile secretion in the regulation of reproduction. N Engl J Med 1986; 315:1459–1468.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Holmgren A, Niklasson A, Gelander L, Aronson AS, Nierop FM, Albertsson K et al. Pubertal height gain is inversely related to peak BMI in childhood. Pediatr Res 2016; 81:448–454.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
O’Malley B, Strott CA. Steroid hormones: metabolism and mechanism of action. In Yen SCC, Jaffe RB, Barbieri RL, eds. Reproductive endocrinology: physiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co. 1999. 110–133  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Winters SJ, Brufsky A, Weissfeld J, Trump DL, Dyky MA, Hadeed V. Testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, and body composition in young adult African American and Caucasian men. Metabolism 2001; 50:1242–1247.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Granger DA, Schwartz EB, Booth A, Arentz M. Salivary testosterone determination in studies of child health and development. Horm Behav 1999; 35:18–27.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Luisi M, Bernini GP, Genovese AD, Birindelli R, Barletta D, Gasperi M, Franchi F. Radioimmunoassay for ‘free’ testosterone in human saliva. J Steroid Biochem 1980; 12:513–516.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Trumble BC, Danlel KC, Kathleen AO, Holman DJ, Ellison PT, Gillian RB et al. Age-independent increases in male salivary testosterone during horticultural activity among Tsimane forager-farmers. Evol Hum Behav 2014; 34:350–357.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ellison PT, Bribiescas ER, Bentley GR, Campbell BC, Susan FL, Catherine PB et al. Population variation in age-related decline in male salivary testosterone. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:3251–3253.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Wellen JJ, Smals AG, Rijken JC, Kloppenborg PW, Benraad TJ. Testosterone and delta 4-androstenedione in the saliva of patients with Klinefelter’s syndrome. Clin Endocrinol 1983; 18:51–59.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity and stages of puberty. Arch Dis Child 1976; 51:170–179.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Said ESA, Ito T, Durham A. First solid-phase radioimmunoassay for free testosterone by the analog method. Clin Chem 1985; 31:910.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ling E, Schubert W, Yannoni C. An automated chemiluminescence immunoassay for human follicle stimulating hormone. Clin Chem 1991; 37:935.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Shellum C, Klee G. A sensitive, specific immunochemluminometric assay for luteinizing hormone in serum and urine. Clin Chem 1991; 37:1038–1039.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Voller A, Bartlett A, Bidwell DE. Enzyme immunoassays with special reference to ELISA techniques. J Clin Pathol 1978; 31:507–519.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Umehara T, Kumamoto Y, Mikuma N, Nanbu A, Nitta S. Salivary testosterone levels in normal boys at puberty. Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi 1991; 67:230–238.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Arregger AL, Contreras LN, Tumilasci OR et al. Salivary testosterone: a reliable approach to the diagnosis of male hypogonadism. Clin Endocrinol 2007; 67:656–662.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Vittek J, L’Hommedieu DG, Gordon GG, Rappaport SC, Southren AL. Direct radio-immunoassay (RIA) of salivary testosterone: correlation with free and total serum testosterone. Life Sci 1985; 37:711–716.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Arregger AL, Contreras LN, Tumilasci OR, Aquilano DR, Cardoso EM. Salivary testosterone: a reliable approach to the diagnosis of male hypogonadism. Clin Endocrinol 2007; 67:656–662.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ruutiainen K, Sannikka E, Santti R, Erkkola R, Adlercreutz H. Salivary testosterone in hirsutism: correlations with serum testosterone and the degree of hair growth. J Clin Endocr Metab 1987; 64:1015–1020.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Osredkar J, Vrhovec I, Jesenovec N, Kocijancic A, Prezelj J. Salivary free testosterone in hirsutism. Ann Clin Biochem 1989; 26 (Part 6):522–526.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Groschl M. Current status of salivary hormone analysis. Clin Chem 2008; 54:1759–1769.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Xia K, Chen M, Zhu P, Lephart ED, Setchell KD, Handa RJ et al. Environmental and genetic contributors to salivary testosterone levels in infants. Front Endocrinol 2014; 5:1–15.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Morley JE, Perry HM, Patrick P, Dollbaum CM, Kells JM, Handa RJ et al. Validation of salivary testosterone as a screening test for male hypogonadism. Aging Male 2006; 9:165–169.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Bogaert V, Taes Y, Konings P, Van Steen K, De Bacquer D, Goemaere S, Kaufman JM. Heritability of blood concentrations of sex-steroids in relation to body composition in young adult male siblings. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008; 69:129–135.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Kaufman E, Lamster IB. The diagnostic applications of saliva, a review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002; 13:197–212.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Chiappin S, Antonelli G, Gatti R, De Palo EF. Saliva specimen: a new laboratory tool for diagnostic and basic investigation. Clin Chem Acta 2007; 383:30–40.  Back to cited text no. 31
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed176    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded35    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]