• Users Online: 136
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 87-91

Outcome of hemodialysis in elderly diabetic patients: a single-center experience


Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Date of Submission17-Feb-2015
Date of Acceptance06-Apr-2015
Date of Web Publication15-Sep-2015

Correspondence Address:
Hatem Darwish
Kasr Al Ainy St. Cairo 11562
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1110-7782.165416

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background
The optimal renal replacement therapy for elderly patients is unclear, and literature is evolving in this regard. For elderly individuals who progress to CKD5, hemodialysis is often a valuable treatment option. Although hemodialysis is a life-sustaining therapy and extends life, it may also create, increase, or prolong suffering in selected subgroups of geriatric patients. In our current study we focused on elderly diabetic patients above 65 years, as they constitute the more vulnerable subgroup, having multiple comorbid conditions. The primary objective was to study the patient's survival and the association with different comorbidities.
Patients and methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 48 type 2 diabetic patients aged above 65 years. We reviewed their survival data and comorbid conditions - namely, vascular, cognitive, and autonomy.
Results and conclusion
The mortality rate was 7.5% per year with significant association with prior cerebrovascular accident, cognitive impairment, and lost autonomy.

Keywords: CKD5, diabetic, elderly, survival


How to cite this article:
Darwish H, Fathi A. Outcome of hemodialysis in elderly diabetic patients: a single-center experience. Egypt J Intern Med 2015;27:87-91

How to cite this URL:
Darwish H, Fathi A. Outcome of hemodialysis in elderly diabetic patients: a single-center experience. Egypt J Intern Med [serial online] 2015 [cited 2017 Nov 24];27:87-91. Available from: http://www.esim.eg.net/text.asp?2015/27/3/87/165416


  Introduction Top


Nephrologists have recognized that the number of elderly patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD5) has been increasing over the past 5 years [1]. The European registry shows that 48% of new dialysis patients are above the age of 65 and have a 2-year survival rate of 51% [2],[3].

The optimal renal replacement therapy for elderly patients is unclear, and literature is evolving in this regard. The concept of maximal conservative management or even withdrawal of dialysis is under active discussion among nephrologists. The rationale behind this is that elderly patients not only suffer from CKD but also from varying degrees of frailty and additional comorbidities. In such situations, initiation of renal replacement treatment might not be the best option as it might not improve the quality of life, nor improve survival [4],[5].

In our current study we tried to focus on elderly diabetic patients above 65 years, as they constitute the more vulnerable subgroup, having multiple comorbid conditions. The primary objective was to study the patient's survival and the association with different comorbidities.


  Patients and methods Top


As per hospital ethical and research committee and also as per international research ethics code no consent is required for retrospective archived file research.

We conducted a retrospective study reviewing the patients admitted to the Dialysis Unit at Dr. Erfan and Bagedo Hospital over 2007-2013 after obtaining approval from the ethical committee of the hospital.

Selection criteria

  1. Presence of type 2 diabetes.
  2. Age 65 years or more.
  3. CKD5 on dialysis.


We excluded patients with a history of malignancy, patients with diseases requiring immunosuppressive treatment, and those who died within three months of initiation of treatment.

A total of 48 patients were identified with a mean age of 70.8 ± 4.7 years and a mean duration of dialysis and follow up of 32 ± 18 months.

Patient files were reviewed for:

  1. Vascular access.
  2. Comorbid conditions such as coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and cerebrovascular disease. Documenting of comorbidities depended on diagnoses established by the corresponding specialty and appropriate imaging studies.
  3. Autonomy, whether independent, wheel chair dependent, or completely bedridden.
  4. Cognitive functions and depression as documented by psychiatric evaluation and medications.


Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using an IBM computer with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS, version 12; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) as follows [6]:

  1. Description of quantitative variables as mean, SD, and range.
  2. Use of the unpaired t-test to compare quantitative variables in parametric data (SD<50% mean).
  3. Use of the Mann-Whitney test instead of the unpaired t-test when SD was greater than 50% of the mean.
  4. Use of the χ2 -test to compare qualitative variables between the two groups.
  5. Use of the Fisher exact test instead of the χ2 -test when one expected cell was less than 5.


P values greater than 0.0 5 were considered insignificant.

P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

P values less than 0.01 were considered highly significant.


  Results Top


[Table 1],[Table 2] and [Table 3] show the demographic and comorbid conditions of the studied cohort.
Table 1: Distribution of the studied cases as regards general data and comorbid conditions

Click here to view
Table 2: Distribution of the studied cases as regards access and hospital stay

Click here to view
Table 3: Distribution of the studied cases as regards outcome

Click here to view


[Table 4],[Table 5],[Table 6] and [Table 7] show the association of depression, cognitive stat, autonomy, and mortality. Our results showed significant association between previous cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and lost autonomy and mortality [Table 6] and [Table 7], and no association of sex, vascular access, PVD, or mortality.
Table 4: Relation between psychiatric disorder and different variables

Click here to view
Table 5: Relation between cognitive outcome and different variables

Click here to view
Table 6: Relation between autonomy and different variables

Click here to view
Table 7: Relation between mortality and different variables

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In our studied cohort, the cutoff age for being considered elderly was 65 years. This cutoff point, which defines elderly, is debatable and inconsistent in different authorities. The common use of a calendar age to mark the threshold of old age assumes equivalence with biological age; yet at the same time it is generally accepted that these two are not necessarily synonymous. While the WHO considers 60+ as the cutoff point, most developed countries have accepted the chronological age of 65 years as a definition of 'elderly' or older person [7],[8],[9]. Taking into consideration the economic and cultural status of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, it was more appropriate to apply the age of 65+ to define elderly.

Our study showed a mortality of 20.8% (10/48 patients) with a mean duration of 32.4 months for hemodialysis (7.55% per year). The mortality was significantly correlated with prior CVA, lost autonomy, and cognitive impairment.

Survival data for elderly diabetic patients are seldom reported separately [10].

In elderly persons, mortality rates worsen with kidney disease more than in other groups. In the general US population, individuals 75-79 years of age have an expected remaining life duration of 10.4 years; for the elderly patient with CKD5, it is 2.6 years, and in the presence of diabetes it is at least 25% less [11].

Studies reported by Dialysis Outcome and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) consistently show a marked difference in crude mortality between different countries, with mortality in the USA being one of the highest. For example, in 2003, DOPPS reported the crude 1-year mortality rate to be 6.6% in Japan, 15.6% in Europe, and 21.7% in the USA [12]. In DOPPS III, 8161 in-center hemodialysis patients participated; the median follow-up was 18 months. During the study period, 1337 participants died (crude mortality rate for all study participants was 12.2/100 patient-years, with mortality rates of 3.7, 10.4, and 21.4 deaths per 100 patient-years for patients <45, 45-74, and ΃75 years of age, respectively) [13].

The incidence of stroke is much higher in CKD patients than in the general population. The United States Renal Data System (USRDS) and National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS) data sets show that the incident dialysis population suffers from a 5-10-fold higher risk of hospitalized stroke in comparison with the non-CKD population [14]. The short-term and long-term mortality associated with stroke appears to be higher in CKD patients than in the general population. In the Okinawa Dialysis Study (OKIDS), the 30-day stroke mortality rate was higher in CKD patients compared with the rate observed in the general population in Okinawa, Japan [15]. In a recent study from Taiwan, among 5672 maintenance hemodialysis patients, 650 (11.5%) patients had prior stroke and were found to have a 36% increased risk for mortality compared with those without prior stroke (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.22-1.52) [16].

Cognitive disorders have long been recognized as a complication of CKD5 and its treatment. The prevalence of cognitive impairment, as assessed using neuropsychological tests among patients with CKD5, ranges from 16 to 38% depending on the sample and the definition of impairment [17]. Dementia increases the risk for poor outcomes, including disability, hospitalization, withdrawal from dialysis, and death [18],[19],[20].

To emphasize the importance of mobility and autonomy in dialysis patients, McAdams-DeMarco et al. [21] enrolled 146 incident hemodialysis patients and followed them up for around 30 months. They found that adults of all ages undergoing hemodialysis have a high prevalence of frailty, more than five times as high as community-dwelling older adults. In this population, regardless of age, frailty is a strong, independent predictor of mortality and number of hospitalizations [21].

In a French study, Couchoud et al. [22] established and validated a bedside scoring system for predicting 6-month mortality in elderly hemodialysis patients. Dependency for transfer was given the highest score of 3 points, compared with diabetes, which was given only 1 point [22].

Vascular access is an important predictor of death in hemodialysis patients. The relative risk for death is increased 2-3-fold in incident patients using catheters compared with those using an arteriovenous access (fistula or graft) [23].

In our study, vascular access had no significant survival outcome. This may be explained by the small number of patients with a catheter (4/48 patients, 8.3%).

For elderly individuals who progress to CKD5, hemodialysis is often a valuable treatment option. Although hemodialysis is a life-sustaining therapy and extends life, it may also create, increase, or prolong suffering in selected subgroups of geriatric patients. In fact, hemodialysis has the attributes of a serious and progressive chronic illness; it may correct uremia, but the disease pathway of the elderly continues [24],[25]. In our studied cohort of patients, there was significant association between both CAD and PVD and cognitive function impairment. This may be because both stem from a common pathological pathway, atherosclerosis, which is well established and has its unique traditional and nontraditional risk factors in CKD patients, especially when diabetes is the etiology of CKD. Moreover, dialysis itself is associated with a significantly increased risk for worsening vascular disease. Registry data and data from observational cohort studies suggest that coexisting vascular disease, whether CAD, PVD, or cerebrovascular disease, is associated with increased mortality risk for patients on dialysis [26],[27].

In conclusion, our study showed a mortality rate of 7.5% in elderly diabetic patients above 65 years. The mortality in such a high-risk group was significantly associated with CVA, cognitive impairment, and lost autonomy.

The limitations of our study include its retrospective nature and the limited number of patients. Nephrologists require more data on renal replacement options in the elderly, as well as on outcome from different options. From this point of view our study might be useful but definitely we are awaiting large-scale studies better characterizing this heterogeneous risky group as well as guidelines for treatment options and outcome.


  Acknowledgements Top


The authors thank the dialysis unit team, medical records department, and research committee at Dr Erfan and Bagedo General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, for their help and support during the preparation of this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Nakai S, Suzuki K, Masakane I, et al. Overview of regular dialysis treatment in Japan (as of 31 December 2008). Ther Apher Dial 2010; 14:505-40.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Dekker FW, Stengel B, Simpson K. Briggs JDERA-EDTA registry committee. The epidemic of aging in renal replacement therapy: an update on elderly patients and their outcomes. Clin Nephrol 2003; 60:352-60.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
ERA-ADTA Registry. ERA-EDTA registry 2005 annual report. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Carson RC, Juszczak M, Davenport A, Burns A. Is maximum conservative management an equivalent treatment option to dialysis for elderly patients with significant comorbid disease? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 1611-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Burns A, Davenport A. Maximum conservative management for patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5. Hemodial Int 2010; Suppl 1:S32-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Miller MC, Knapp RG. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics. 3rd ed. Maryland: Williams & Wilkins; 1992.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Thane P. History and the sociology of ageing. Soc Hist Med 1989; 2: 93-96.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Glascock AP, Feinman SL. A holocultural analysis of old age. Comp Soc Res 1980; 3:311-32.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Freund AM, Smith J. Self-definition in old age. Z Sozialpsychol 1997; 28:44-59  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kurella M, Covinsky KE, Collins AJ, Chertow GM. Octogenarians and nonagenarians starting dialysis in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146:177-83.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
US Renal Data Systems. USRDS 2005 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Goodkin DA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Koenig KG, Wolfe RA, Akiba T, Andreucci VE, et al. Association of comorbid conditions and mortality in hemodialysis patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:3270-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Canaud B, Tong L, Tentori F, Akiba T, Karaboyas A, Gillespie B, et al. Clinical practices and outcomes in elderly hemodialysis patients: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6:1651-62.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Seliger SL, Gillen DL, Tirschwell D, Wasse H, Kestenbaum BR, Stehman-Breen CO. Risk factors for incident stroke among patients with end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:2623-31.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Iseki K, Tozawa M, Iseki C, Takishita S, Ogawa Y. Demographic trends in the Okinawa Dialysis Study (OKIDS) registry (1971-2000). Kidney Int 2002; 61:668-75.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Chien CC, Sun YM, Wang JJ, Chu CC, Lu CL, Wang SF, et al. Increased risk of mortality among haemodialysis patients with or without prior stroke: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan. Indian J Med Res 2013; 138:232-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
17.
Kurella Tamura M, Larive B, Unruh M, et al. Prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment in the frequent hemodialysis network (FHN) trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 8:1429-1438.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Kurella M, Mapes DL, Port FK, Chertow GM. Correlates and outcomes of dementia among dialysis patients: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21:2543-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Kurella Tamura M, Covinsky KE, Chertow GM, Yaffe K, Landefeld CS, McCulloch CE. Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:1539-47.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rakowski DA, Caillard S, Agodoa LY, Abbott KC. Dementia as a predictor of mortality in dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1:1000-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
McAdams-DeMarco MA, Law A, Salter ML, Boyarsky B, Gimenez L, Jaar BG, et al. Frailty as a novel predictor of mortality and hospitalization in individuals of all ages undergoing hemodialysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61:896-901.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Couchoud C, Labeeuw M, Moranne O, Allot V, Esnault V, Frimat L, Stengel B. French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry. A clinical score to predict 6-month prognosis in elderly patients starting dialysis for end-stage renal. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24:1553-61.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Polkinghorne KR, McDonald SP, Atkins RC, Kerr PG. Vascular access and all-cause mortality: a propensity score analysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15:477-86.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Swidler M. Dialysis decisions in the elderly patient with advanced CKD and the role of nondialytic therapy (Chapter 37). In: Oreopoulos D, Wiggins J, editors American Society of Nephrology Geriatric Nephrology Curriculum. Washington, DC, USA: American Society of Nephrology; 2009. 1-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Wong CF, McCarthy M, Howse ML, Williams PS. Factors affecting survival in advanced chronic kidney disease patients who choose not to receive dialysis. Ren Fail 2007; 29:653-659.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32(Suppl 3): 112-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Levin A, Djurdjev O, Barrett B, Burgess E, Carlisle E, Ethier J, et al. Cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease: getting to the heart of the matter. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 38:1398-407.  Back to cited text no. 27
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed385    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded104    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]